lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed workload
Date
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:20 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > This is reasonable, except for the fact that pages that are moved
> > to the inactive list without having the referenced bit cleared are
> > guaranteed to be moved back to the active list.
> >
> > You'll be better off without that excess list movement, by simply
> > moving pages directly back onto the active list if the trylock
> > fails.
> >
>
>
> The attached patch addresses this issue by changing page_check_address()
> to return -1 if the spin_trylock() fails and page_referenced_one() to
> return 1 in that path so the page gets moved back to the active list.
>
> Also, BTW, check this out: an 8-CPU/16GB system running AIM 7 Compute
> has 196491 isolated_anon pages. This means that ~6140 processes are
> somewhere down in try_to_free_pages() since we only isolate 32 pages at
> a time, this is out of 9000 processes...
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> active_anon:2140361 inactive_anon:453356 isolated_anon:196491
> active_file:3438 inactive_file:1100 isolated_file:0
> unevictable:2802 dirty:153 writeback:0 unstable:0
> free:578920 slab_reclaimable:49214 slab_unreclaimable:93268
> mapped:1105 shmem:0 pagetables:139100 bounce:0
>
> Node 0 Normal free:1647892kB min:12500kB low:15624kB high:18748kB
> active_anon:7835452kB inactive_anon:785764kB active_file:13672kB
> inactive_file:4352kB unevictable:11208kB isolated(anon):785964kB
> isolated(file):0kB present:12410880kB mlocked:11208kB dirty:604kB
> writeback:0kB mapped:4344kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:177792kB
> slab_unreclaimable:368676kB kernel_stack:73256kB pagetables:489972kB
> unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0
>
> 202895 total pagecache pages
> 197629 pages in swap cache
> Swap cache stats: add 6954838, delete 6757209, find 1251447/2095005
> Free swap = 65881196kB
> Total swap = 67354616kB
> 3997696 pages RAM
> 207046 pages reserved
> 1688629 pages shared
> 3016248 pages non-shared

This seems we have to improve reclaim bale out logic. the system already
have 1.5GB free pages. IOW, the system don't need swap-out anymore.



> @@ -352,9 +359,11 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct page *page,
> if (address == -EFAULT)
> goto out;
>
> - pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl, 0);
> + pte = page_check_address(page, mm, address, &ptl, 0, trylock);
> if (!pte)
> goto out;
> + else if (pte == (pte_t *)-1)
> + return 1;
>
> /*
> * Don't want to elevate referenced for mlocked page that gets this far,

Sorry, NAK.
I have to say the same thing of Rik's previous mention. shrink_active_list()
ignore the return value of page_referenced(). then above 'return 1' is meaningless.

Umm, ok, I'll make the patch myself.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-04 01:39    [W:0.074 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site