[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Patch] tty: move a definition out of switch block
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 01:36, Cong Wang <> wrote:
> Generally putting variables local in the local scope is fine, but
> not for 'switch' block, to be more precisely, not for the case
> where putting local variables between 'switch' and its _first_
> label, IMO.

It is fine to declare variables at the start of a switch statement.
What *is* incorrect is either initializing such declared variables
(they won't get initialized) or declaring variables *after* a case
label (throws a compile error).

> It can lead to misunderstanding easily, since 'switch'
> jumps to its first label at a first glance. I know in this case
> the code is _not_ wrong, but again, it's not good for reading.

I would think the declaration inside the start of the switch block
would just indicate to the reader that the variable is local to the
switch block scope.

> Also, there's no conflicts if we put it out of 'switch' block.

But then the scope of these variables becomes larger than it need be.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-03 16:27    [W:0.059 / U:6.896 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site