lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: core of the scheduling class
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 15:37 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 15:30 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
    > > > +struct task_struct *pick_next_task_deadline(struct rq *rq)
    > > > +{
    > > > + struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
    > > > + struct task_struct *p;
    > > > + struct dl_rq *dl_rq;
    > > > +
    > > > + dl_rq = &rq->dl;
    > > > +
    > > > + if (likely(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running))
    > > > + return NULL;
    > > > +
    > > > + dl_se = pick_next_deadline_entity(rq, dl_rq);
    > > > + BUG_ON(!dl_se);
    > > > +
    > > > + p = deadline_task_of(dl_se);
    > > > + p->se.exec_start = rq->clock;
    > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK
    > > > + if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
    > > > + start_hrtick_deadline(rq, p);
    > > > +#endif
    > > > + return p;
    > > > +}
    > >
    > > I'm not sure about actually using hrtick like this, I'd expect
    > > SCHED_DEADLINE to always use hrtimers when available. The only reason
    > > to use some of the hrtick infrastructure is to re-use the hrtick_start()
    > > logic which uses IPIs to ensure we program the timer on the right cpu
    > > (so we can schedule from it).
    >
    > Hmm I suppose we could ignore all that CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK stuff and
    > simply bounce the schedule event using the resched ipi when we find
    > we're on the wrong cpu. Not ideal though.. frigging mess all this :-)

    Hmm bugger that, that's not going to work since the fallback timer stuff
    doesn't run from hardirq context and is generally useless anyway :-)



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-29 15:43    [W:0.045 / U:1.232 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site