[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4)
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:55:11 +0100, Pavel Machek said:

> it is really only required for binaries setuid to someone else, but
> that would be too ugly. (Plus, as someone said, ping is great for
> leaking data out.)

Hmm... How is it "too ugly"? It's just a 'euid != uid' comparison? Or
am I missing some contortion required?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-28 22:33    [W:0.155 / U:3.668 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site