[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: disablenetwork facility. (v4)
    On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:55:11 +0100, Pavel Machek said:

    > it is really only required for binaries setuid to someone else, but
    > that would be too ugly. (Plus, as someone said, ping is great for
    > leaking data out.)

    Hmm... How is it "too ugly"? It's just a 'euid != uid' comparison? Or
    am I missing some contortion required?
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-28 22:33    [W:0.019 / U:20.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site