Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:18:24 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: tree with htc dream support |
| |
Hi!
> > Switch smd code to the version in staging. Something to apply to > > dream/ tree I'd say... and yes, it still works. > > I think we might want to consider leaving at least the core smd code > under mach-msm.
In the long run, I agree.
In the short run... the code is staging quality, so it should be in staging... and you'll not have to mainain so huge diff. (-20 kLoc).
> To start with it's specific to the 7k/8k platform, not dream (though > that may just be a quirk of how things are named in staging). Also > the lowest layers (proc_comm and smsm_state stuff) are required for > clock control and basic power management to work -- they're kinda > joined at the hip with the platform. It seems weird to me to have the > necessary bits to implement clock/power/pm outside of the mach/arch > space.
Agreed, but... I don't see much effort merging 7k/8k patches. And I believe its better to use code that's already in staging/ to keep diffs small. Renames are easy with git, and yes, we'll need to do some moving when code is clean enough.
But that's how staging/ works: all the code there will need to be moved to the proper places...
> The higher level stuff (qmi, rpcrouter, smdtty, etc) could easily live > elsewhere (though I'm not sure where the best space in the drivers > hierarchy for them would be).
drivers/mfd? Yes, we'll have to rename once the code is clean enough.
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |