lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: utimensat fails to update ctime
Date
Eric Blake <ebb9@byu.net> writes:

> POSIX requires that utimensat/futimens must update ctime in all cases
> where any change is made (it only exempts when both atime and mtime were
> requested as UTIME_OMIT, where the file must exist but no change is made).
> Unfortunately, when atime is specified and mtime is UTIME_OMIT, the
> kernel mistakenly behaves like read(), by updating atime but not ctime.
> This in turn caused a regression in coreutils 8.2, visible through 'touch -a':
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-12/msg00171.html
>
> Here is a simple program demonstrating the failure:
> $ cat foo.c
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> int
> main ()
> {
> int fd = creat ("file", 0600);
> struct stat st1, st2;
> struct timespec t[2] = { { 1000000000, 0 }, { 0, UTIME_OMIT } };
> fstat (fd, &st1);
> sleep (1);
> futimens (fd, t);
> fstat (fd, &st2);
> return st1.st_ctime == st2.st_ctime;
> }
> $ gcc -o foo foo.c -D_GNU_SOURCE
> $ ./foo; echo $?
> 1
>
> The exit status should have been 0.
>
> GNU coreutils will end up working around the bug by calling fstat/[l]stat
> prior to futimens/utimensat, and populating the mtime field with the
> desired value rather than using UTIME_OMIT. But this is a pointless stat
> call, which could be avoided if the kernel were fixed to comply with POSIX
> by updating ctime even when mtime is UTIME_OMIT.

I couldn't reproduce this with your test program on my machine (latest
linus tree). And that utime path looks like no problem, um..., can you
provide output of strace or something?

Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-21 08:35    [W:0.147 / U:1.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site