[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #5)
On Wed 2009-12-16 12:31:43, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:15:45PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > The big question with all of this is: Should a task have the ability
> > to follow a /proc/pid symlink to a path that it wouldn't ordinarily be
> > able to resolve with a path lookup. The concensus that I got from the
> > bugtraq discussion was that it should not, and this patch is an attempt
> > to prevent that.
> >
> > I take it from you and Eric's comments that you disagree? If so, what's
> > your rationale for allowing a task to resolve this symlink when it
> > wouldn't ordinarily be able to do so if it were a "normal" symlink?
> WTF not? It's convenient and doesn't lose any real security. If your
> code relies on inaccessibility of <path> since some component of that
> path is inaccessible, you are *already* fscked. Consider e.g. fchdir()
> and its implications - if you have an opened descriptor for parent,
> having no exec permissions on grandparent won't stop you at all. Already.
> On all Unices, regardless of openat(), etc.

Consider FD passing over unix socket. Passing R/O file descriptor to
the other task, then having the task write to the file is certainly bad.

> I might buy the argument about restricting reopening with wider permissions,
> but
> a) we still are looking at possible userland breakage of the worst
> kind - random scripts passing /dev/fd/42 as command line arguments to
> random programs. Once in a while. With error checking being... not quite
> sufficient.
> b) it's not just open - we have at least chmod/chown/truncate to
> deal with.

That's indeed the sane way to solve that.

> Prohibiting *all* access is a complete non-starter - things like
> cmp foo /dev/stdin || ....
> would bloody better work and nobody cares whether you have redirect
> from something out of your reach at the moment.

(cesky, pictures)

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-20 21:01    [W:0.095 / U:4.856 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site