[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sched: restore sanity
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:17 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:22:23 -0800 Joe Perches <> wrote:
> > What are the negatives of using pr_<level>?
> pr_ is really just for "I am a driver and want a single line message
> out in a standardized format".
> Nothing wrong with that.
> But here you are changing fundamental kernel outputs in the style of an
> oops message. Multiline, complex and machine parsed things...

The prefixing was trivial to change.
No other output was modified.

I believe kernel log output is specifically _not_ guaranteed
and should not be so guaranteed to remain stable across

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-20 19:25    [W:0.101 / U:3.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site