lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: sched: restore sanity
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 19:17 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:22:23 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
    > > What are the negatives of using pr_<level>?
    > pr_ is really just for "I am a driver and want a single line message
    > out in a standardized format".
    > Nothing wrong with that.
    >
    > But here you are changing fundamental kernel outputs in the style of an
    > oops message. Multiline, complex and machine parsed things...

    The prefixing was trivial to change.
    No other output was modified.

    I believe kernel log output is specifically _not_ guaranteed
    and should not be so guaranteed to remain stable across
    versions.




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-20 19:25    [W:5.742 / U:0.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site