Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:46:45 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:36 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Or do you (or anyone else) have a better name? > > How about renaming DEFINE_EVENT to TRACE_EVENT_CLASS? > > DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(y, ...) declare an event-class y > TRACE_EVENT_CLASS(x, y, ...) define/declare a trace event x from event-class y > TRACE_EVENT(x, ...) define/declare a trace event x > > Thus TRACE_EVENT_* implies that this macro will be expanded > to both of definition and declaration. > I don't think separating it is good idea from the viewpoint > of maintaining code.
Hmm, what about just:
TRACE_CLASS - Declares a class TRACE_CLASS_EVENT - defines an event for said class TRACE_EVENT - Declares a class and defines an event (as is today)
-- Steve
| |