lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:36 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

    > > Or do you (or anyone else) have a better name?
    >
    > How about renaming DEFINE_EVENT to TRACE_EVENT_CLASS?
    >
    > DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(y, ...) declare an event-class y
    > TRACE_EVENT_CLASS(x, y, ...) define/declare a trace event x from event-class y
    > TRACE_EVENT(x, ...) define/declare a trace event x
    >
    > Thus TRACE_EVENT_* implies that this macro will be expanded
    > to both of definition and declaration.
    > I don't think separating it is good idea from the viewpoint
    > of maintaining code.

    Hmm, what about just:

    TRACE_CLASS - Declares a class
    TRACE_CLASS_EVENT - defines an event for said class
    TRACE_EVENT - Declares a class and defines an event (as is today)

    -- Steve




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-02 23:49    [W:3.657 / U:0.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site