Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Doubt about Regulator Framework and VBAT use case | | From | (Högander Jouni) | | Date | Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:32:06 +0200 |
| |
ext Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > >> I'm writing to ask about VBAT use case. What is the expected >> way to use regulator framework in case of rail coming from battery? >> Should it be added to the regulator framework at all? > > ... > >> However, drivers for devices on that rail would require their regulator anyway. >> And I guess the point would be that drivers should not be aware that they are on VBAT >> or any other rail. > > I'd add it as a fixed voltage regulator and either not specify the > voltage or specify the nominal voltage.
I was preparing patch for this when I noticed that fixed voltage regulator can control only one regulator. Are you aware of any ongoing work to enable control for multiple regulators in fixed-voltage-regulator?
-- Jouni Högander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |