lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS
From
Date
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 06:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Having said that, we generally try to make things perform well without apps
> > having to switch themselves to SCHED_BATCH. Mike, do you think we can make
> > x264 perform as well (or nearly as well) under SCHED_OTHER as under
> > SCHED_BATCH?
>
> It's not bad as is, except for ultrafast mode. START_DEBIT is the
> biggest problem there. I don't think SCHED_OTHER will ever match
> SCHED_BATCH for this load, though I must say I haven't full-spectrum
> tested. This load really wants RR scheduling, and wakeup preemption
> necessarily perturbs run order.
>
> I'll probably piddle with it some more, it's an interesting load.
Yes, i must say, very interresting, its very complicated and... oh wait,
its just encoding a movie!
>
> -Mike
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-18 11:59    [W:0.067 / U:4.804 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site