lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: High load average on idle machine running 2.6.32
From
Date
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 14:43 +0100, Andrea Suisani wrote:

> >>> Strangely, when I run 'iftop' (from
> >>> http://www.ex-parrot.com/pdw/iftop/) using the 2.6.32 kernel, the
> >>> load average drops to below 0.5 - stop running iftop, and the load
> >>> average climbs again ...

This is the thing that puzzles me most..

> >> Also, if I 'hot-unplug' CPUs 1 to 7, the load average drops to 0 -
> >> when I re-enable theses CPUs, the load average climbs.

Very curious too

> >> I guess this is a problem with my particular config - or maybe because
> >> I'm using NFS-root (the root file system is readonly), or using a
> >> non-module kernel?

Russell, you grumbled something like this on IRC, are you too using
NFS-root?

> > I gave 'git bisect' a go - which appears to suggest that my problem
> > started at:
> >
> > % git bisect bad
> > d7c33c4930f569caf6b2ece597432853c4151a45 is first bad commit
> > commit d7c33c4930f569caf6b2ece597432853c4151a45
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Date: Fri Sep 11 12:45:38 2009 +0200
> >
> > sched: Fix task affinity for select_task_rq_fair
> >
> > While merging select_task_rq_fair() and sched_balance_self() I made
> > a mistake that leads to testing the wrong task affinty.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > :040000 040000 3d7aa3e193c7faf9c7ebbb1443c6f63269d86d04
> > 9cfb647eb5d80f156fd8a495da68f765c3fdd772 M kernel

> > So I guess, it is not just one patch that has caused the issue I'm
> > seeing, which I guess is to be expected as the above patch was part of
> > the 'scheduler updates for v2.6.32' patch set

Right, so the thing that seems most likely to cause such funnies is the
introduction of TASK_WAKING state in .32, during development we had a
brief period where we saw what you described, but I haven't seen it
after:

commit eb24073bc1fe3e569a855cf38d529fb650c35524
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Wed Sep 16 21:09:13 2009 +0200

sched: Fix TASK_WAKING & loadaverage breakage

> > I guess as no one else has reported this issue - it must be something to
> > do with my set up - could using NFS-root affect how the load average is
> > calculated?

So the thing that contributes to load is TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleeps
(and !PF_FREEZING) as tested by task_contributes_to_load().

Are you seeing a matching number of tasks being stuck in 'D' state when
the load is high? If so, how are these tasks affected by iftop/hotplug?





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-18 15:15    [W:0.078 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site