Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:49:12 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Teach might_sleep() about preemptible RCU |
| |
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:23:57PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > From: tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > > > > Crap... I think I'm really becoming this cyborg... > > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Although I've happily put Paul's Reviewed-by tag in this v2, > > I'd feel more comfortable if he could confirm it :) > > Given that I missed the TINY_RCU problem, I am not sure how much my > Reviewed-by tag is worth, but I have no problem attaching it to this updated > patch. ;-)
Reviewed-by is valuable in terms of you both acking the patch and expressing that you thought it through and like it. It does not mean you have done a mental kernel build test of all 2^3000 kernel .config variants and have proven the patch correct under circumstances! :-)
So yes, i've added it - thanks Paul!
Ingo
| |