lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Wrong atime on recent kernels
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 21:55 +0100, Petr Titěra wrote:
    > john stultz napsal(a):
    > > 2009/12/14 Petr Titěra <petr@titera.eu>:
    > >
    > > > Hello,
    > > >
    > > > I see some strange file modification times recently. It seems to me
    > > > that in some situations, kernel allows to set nanoseconds part of file
    > > > access, modification or change time to 100000000 ns. Problem seems to be in
    > > > some generic part of kernel because I see it on several different
    > > > filesysytems (ext4 and nilf2). These is I've got during my testing on kernel
    > > > 2.6.32-tip-08309-gad8e75a.
    > > >
    > > > File: `./Documentation/dvb/contributors.txt'
    > > > Size: 3035 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
    > > > Device: fe04h/65028d Inode: 818 Links: 1
    > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
    > > > Access: 2009-12-14 10:29:04.1000000000 +0100
    > > > Modify: 2009-12-14 10:29:04.1000000000 +0100
    > > > Change: 2009-12-14 10:29:04.1000000000 +0100
    > > >
    > > > See that all times of that file ends with 1e6 nanoseconds.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Hrmmm. Does reverting this change solve it?
    > >
    > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=patch;h=7bc7d637452383d56ba4368d4336b0dde1bb476d
    > >
    > > thanks
    > > -john
    > >
    > Hello,
    >
    > I did not test reverting this patch yet, because I did not find
    > reliable way how to reproduce these strange modify times. But as I
    > read your description. Would it be possible that if there would be bug
    > in your patch i would be observer on mostly quiet system? I'm asking
    > because full day of testing of the system under load did not produce
    > any result, but then when I tried to run "find / | xargs stat" on idle
    > system I've got several new instances of wrong access time (filesystem
    > is mounted without noatime)

    Yes, its possible it would be more likely to be seen on an idle system.

    Can you describe your system to me? Is it x86? x86_64? Could you send
    your .config to me?

    Please try to revert the patch, and I'll see if I can reproduce anything
    similar on my systems.

    thanks
    -john


    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-17 02:27    [W:0.022 / U:32.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site