Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:14:48 -0800 | From | Yinghai Lu <> | Subject | Re: kexec boot regression |
| |
Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix >>>> >>>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it >>> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the >>> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue? >>> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work. >> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it. >> >> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly. >> >> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in >> second kernel? > > Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT > complaints and NUMA works fine.
do you need memmap=62G@4G in this case?
YH
| |