lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove usedac in feature-removal-schedule.txt
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> The reason of removal, "replaced by allowdac and no dac combination"
> is incorrect. There is no way to do the same thing with "allowdac" and
> "nodac" combination.
>
> The usedac option enables us to stop via_no_dac() setting forbid_dac
> to 1. That is, someone who uses VIA bridges can use DAC with this
> option even if some of VIA bridges seem to be broken about DAC.
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>


Hi,

This sounds reasonable for me.

Acked-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>

> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 -------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 2a4d779..eb2c138 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -291,13 +291,6 @@ Who: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
>
> ---------------------------
>
> -What: usedac i386 kernel parameter
> -When: 2.6.27
> -Why: replaced by allowdac and no dac combination
> -Who: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> -
> ----------------------------
> -
> What: print_fn_descriptor_symbol()
> When: October 2009
> Why: The %pF vsprintf format provides the same functionality in a



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-14 08:51    [W:0.607 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site