Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:50:25 +0800 | From | Cong Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] remove usedac in feature-removal-schedule.txt |
| |
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > The reason of removal, "replaced by allowdac and no dac combination" > is incorrect. There is no way to do the same thing with "allowdac" and > "nodac" combination. > > The usedac option enables us to stop via_no_dac() setting forbid_dac > to 1. That is, someone who uses VIA bridges can use DAC with this > option even if some of VIA bridges seem to be broken about DAC. > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Hi,
This sounds reasonable for me.
Acked-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 ------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 2a4d779..eb2c138 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -291,13 +291,6 @@ Who: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> > > --------------------------- > > -What: usedac i386 kernel parameter > -When: 2.6.27 > -Why: replaced by allowdac and no dac combination > -Who: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> > - > ---------------------------- > - > What: print_fn_descriptor_symbol() > When: October 2009 > Why: The %pF vsprintf format provides the same functionality in a
| |