lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments
Date
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> 1) held spinlocks are not equivalent to rcu_read_lock
>
> 2) access to current_cred() is safe as only current can modify its
> own credentials.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-11 15:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans