lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments
    Date
    Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

    > 1) held spinlocks are not equivalent to rcu_read_lock
    >
    > 2) access to current_cred() is safe as only current can modify its
    > own credentials.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

    Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-11 15:05    [W:0.024 / U:33.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site