Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:40:25 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [tip:x86/apic] x86/apic: Limit irq affinity |
| |
* Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote: > > > > > Commit-ID: 683c91f85d7a3e1092d7fa3ec5687af8cd379f02 > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/683c91f85d7a3e1092d7fa3ec5687af8cd379f02 > > > Author: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> > > > AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:40:37 -0600 > > > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > > CommitDate: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:30:40 +0100 > > > > > > x86/apic: Limit irq affinity > > > > > > This patch allows for hard numa restrictions to irq affinity on > > > x86 systems. > > > > -tip testing found a build failure: > > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:1438: error: ???struct irq_desc??? has no member named ???node??? > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:3286: error: ???struct irq_desc??? has no member named ???node??? > > > > In the interest of doing some ifdef cleanup as well as fixing the > build problem, can I suggest that we remove the 'ifdef CONFIG_SMP' > from the irq_desc?
What's the (data and code) size effect on UP kernels?
Ingo
| |