[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] misc: use a proper range for minor number dynamic allocation
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:28:17 -0200
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <> wrote:

> The current dynamic allocation of minor number for misc devices has some
> drawbacks.
> First of all, the range for dynamic numbers include some statically
> allocated numbers. It goes from 63 to 0, and we have numbers in the
> range from 1 to 15 already allocated. Although, it gives priority to the
> higher and not allocated numbers, we may end up in a situation where we
> must reject registering a driver which got a static number because a
> driver got its number with dynamic allocation. Considering fs/dlm/user.c
> allocates as many misc devices as lockspaces are created, and that we
> have more than 50 users around, it's not unreasonable to reach that
> situation.

What is this DLM behaviour of which you speak? It sounds broken.

> The proposed solution uses the not yet reserved range from 64 to 127. If
> more devices are needed, we may push 64 to 16. Moreover, if we don't
> need to give priority to the higher numbers anymore, we can start using
> the bitmap/bitops functions.

So... misc minors 64 to 127 are presently unused?

> Finally, if there's a failure creating the device (because there's
> already one with the same name, for example), the current implementation
> does not clear the bit for the allocated minor and that number is lost
> for future allocations.

Is that a bugfix for the existing code?

If so, please split that out into a separate patch which we can review
and apply promptly while we consider the broader problem which you've

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-09 22:31    [W:0.041 / U:18.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site