lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 22/23] sysctl arm: Remove binary sysctl support
From
Date
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> writes:
>
>>
>> NAK. Glibc uses these numeric sysctls to support ioperm emulation on ARM.
>> Therefore, removal of these numeric sysctls breaks that user interface:
>>
>> static int iobase_name[] = { CTL_BUS, BUS_ISA, BUS_ISA_PORT_BASE };
>> static int ioshift_name[] = { CTL_BUS, BUS_ISA, BUS_ISA_PORT_SHIFT };
>> if (! sysctl (iobase_name, 3, &io.io_base, &len, NULL, 0)
>> && ! sysctl (ioshift_name, 3, &io.shift, &len, NULL, 0))
>> {
>> io.initdone = 1;
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> Those still exist in sysctl_binary.c are provided by reading
> /proc/sys/bus/isa/membase, /proc/sys/bus/isa/portbase, and
> /proc/sys/bus/isa/portshift.
>
> The practical difference is that /proc support now must be compiled
> in to support sys_sysctl.

But thanks for the reminder that I need to go into glibc and fix this before
we disable the sys_sysctl emulation by default.

Eric


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-09 00:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans