[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Subject: [RFC MM] mmap_sem scaling: Use mutex and percpu counter instead
    Christoph Lameter <> writes:

    > Instead of a rw semaphore use a mutex and a per cpu counter for the number
    > of the current readers. read locking then becomes very cheap requiring only
    > the increment of a per cpu counter.
    > Write locking is more expensive since the writer must scan the percpu array
    > and wait until all readers are complete. Since the readers are not holding
    > semaphores we have no wait queue from which the writer could wakeup. In this
    > draft we simply wait for one millisecond between scans of the percpu
    > array. A different solution must be found there.

    I'm not sure making all writers more expensive is really a good idea.

    For example it will definitely impact the AIM7 multi brk() issue
    or the mysql allocation case, which are all writer intensive. I assume
    doing a lot of mmaps/brks in parallel is not that uncommon.

    My thinking was more that we simply need per VMA locking or
    some other per larger address range locking. Unfortunately that
    needs changes in a lot of users that mess with the VMA lists
    (perhaps really needs some better abstractions for VMA list management

    That said also addressing the convoying issues in the current
    semaphores would be a good idea, which is what your patch does.


    -- -- Speaking for myself only.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-05 21:59    [W:0.366 / U:12.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site