[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup
    * Jan Safranek <> [2009-11-04 17:02:22]:

    > On 11/04/2009 04:21 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
    > >On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
    > >>The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be
    > >>mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup
    > >>is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote
    > >>for it as +1 for /cgroup.
    > >
    > >/dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does
    > >deal with actual devices. cgroups do not.
    > There is also /dev/shm, but IMHO that's not reason to pollute /dev
    > with filesystems that are not devices.

    Yep, but hasn't the pollution already occured with /dev/cpuset today?
    sysfs would require work for changes to /sys, so do we go with Kame's
    suggestion of /cgroup?


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-04 17:07    [W:0.020 / U:104.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site