lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: sparc tree build failure
    On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, David Miller wrote:
    > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
    > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:16:07 +1100
    >
    > > Today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig) failed like this:
    > >
    > > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c: In function '__atomic_add_return':
    > > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:34: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
    > > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore'
    > >
    > > Caused by commit 4df286e52917c95c415400367cfd523dfbb0f93a ("sparc: Make
    > > atomic locks raw") which I have reverted for today.
    >
    > Ho hum, that's the second iteration and it broke the build first time
    > too.
    >
    > __raw_spin_lock_irqsave() definitions don't exist anywhere in the
    > tree, I wonder what this was even build tested against?
    >
    > I'm reverting, and I'll be hard pressed to add new versions without
    > solid proof that it doesn't break the build a third time :-)

    /me blushes. Dunno what went wrong this time. Sorry.

    tglx


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-27 10:03    [W:0.022 / U:1.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site