lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: sparc tree build failure
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:16:07 +1100
>
> > Today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c: In function '__atomic_add_return':
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:34: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore'
> >
> > Caused by commit 4df286e52917c95c415400367cfd523dfbb0f93a ("sparc: Make
> > atomic locks raw") which I have reverted for today.
>
> Ho hum, that's the second iteration and it broke the build first time
> too.
>
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave() definitions don't exist anywhere in the
> tree, I wonder what this was even build tested against?
>
> I'm reverting, and I'll be hard pressed to add new versions without
> solid proof that it doesn't break the build a third time :-)

/me blushes. Dunno what went wrong this time. Sorry.

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-27 10:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans