lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next: workqueues tree build failure
    Hello,

    11/27/2009 05:37 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
    >> Sounds like it should be using bottom half tasklet not workqueue.
    >> Tasklet is exactly designed to handle situations like this. Is there
    >> any reason tasklet can't be used?
    >
    > Right now the h/w accessing code is using mutex. I'm not sure whether
    > the deeper part might sleep, though...

    Ah... I see. Using mutex from a handler where response time is
    critical is strange tho. Anyways, I don't really think singlethread
    will satisfy the timing requirement under loaded conditions. IMHO,
    update locking and using tasklets would be the best.

    Thanks.

    --
    tejun


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-27 09:45    [W:0.027 / U:61.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site