On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 17:25 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > Aside from that, we probably should put an upper limit in place, as I
> > guess large cpu count machines get silly large values
> I agree to that, but in the code is already an upper limit of 
> 200.000.000 - well we might discuss if that is too low/high.

Yeah, I think we should cap it around the 8-16 CPUs.