lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kbuild: Steppeing down as Maintainer
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:21:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:26:13 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > It has been fun but the last year or more it has
> > been a duty and a burden. So I leave it open for
> > other to take over.
>
> I, also, want to thank you very much for all your work.
>
> I am, however, wondering what will happen to the changes you have that are
> currently in linux-next:
>
> Apparently for v2.6.32 (in kbuild-current):
>
> Michael Tokarev (1):
> kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86
>
> And queued for v2.6.33:
>
> Sam Ravnborg (14):
> kbuild: search arch/$ARCH/include before include/
> dontdiff: add generated
> kbuild: move bounds.h to include/generated
> kbuild: move asm-offsets.h to include/generated
> ia64: move nr-irqs.h to include/generated
> arm: move mach-types to include/generated
> sh: move machtypes.h to include/generated
> kbuild: drop include2/ used for O=... builds
> kbuild: do not check for include/asm-$ARCH
> kbuild: drop include/asm
> kbuild: move compile.h to include/generated
> drop explicit include of autoconf.h
> kbuild: move autoconf.h to include/generated
> kbuild: move utsrelease.h to include/generated
>
> I am (for the moment) still merging these from the copy I have of your
> trees, but what to do in the longer term?

I will submit the patches like any other regular submitter to linux-kbuild
if the upcoming Maintainers does not pick them up from the git trees.

So for now keeping the pull would be nice but as soon as you have
a ew set of kbuild tress then drop these.

Frankly I had forgot that I had a patch in -fixes...

Sam


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-25 18:55    [W:0.109 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site