lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: lockdep complaints in slab allocator
Peter Zijlstra kirjoitti:
> On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:59 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>> Thanks! Please let me know when you're hammered it enough :-). Peter,
>> may I have your ACK or NAK on the patch, please?
>
> Well, I'm not going to NAK it, for I think it does clean up that
> recursion crap a little, but it should have more merit that
> side-stepping lockdep.
>
> If you too feel it make SLAB ever so slightly more palatable then ACK,
> otherwise I'm perfectly fine with letting SLAB bitrot.

I'll take that as an ACK ;-) Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-25 11:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog