Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:48:14 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator |
| |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:12:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Merge SLQB and rm mm/sl[ua]b.c include/linux/sl[ua]b.h for .33-rc1 > > > > > > > slqb still has a 5-10% performance regression compared to slab for > > benchmarks such as netperf TCP_RR on machines with high cpu counts, > > forcing that type of regression isn't acceptable. > > Having _4_ slab allocators is equally unacceptable.
I completely agree. We need at least ten. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
| |