lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics

    * Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

    > Hi Ingo,
    >
    > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    > > Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic
    > > consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core
    > > kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and
    > > constant distraction from having two targets.
    >
    > Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only
    > reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no
    > perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in
    > putting userspace tools in the tree.
    >
    > I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)

    it does :-)

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-24 08:49    [W:0.021 / U:207.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site