lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics

* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic
> > consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core
> > kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and
> > constant distraction from having two targets.
>
> Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only
> reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no
> perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in
> putting userspace tools in the tree.
>
> I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)

it does :-)

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-24 08:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans