Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:45:00 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
Hi Ingo,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic > consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core > kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and > constant distraction from having two targets.
Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in putting userspace tools in the tree.
I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)
| |