Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator | From | Matt Mackall <> | Date | Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:01:57 -0600 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:01 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 21:50 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > > That turns out to be _very_ hard. How about something like the following > > > > untested patch which delays slab_destroy() while we're under nc->lock. > > > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:30 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Code changes to deal with a diagnostic issue? > > > > OK, fair enough. If I suffer permanent brain damage from staring at the > > SLAB code for too long, I hope you and Matt will chip in to pay for my > > medication.
You Europeans and your droll health care jokes.
> Maybe something like this untested patch fixes the issue...
This looks like a much better approach.
-- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
| |