lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
    From
    On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> wrote:
    > I think this makes a lot of sense.
    > But: we don't need a database of RC codes in the kernel (that's a lot of
    > data, the user has to select the RC in use anyway so he/she can simply
    > provide mapping e.g. RC5<>keycode).

    Just bear in mind that with the current in-kernel code, users do *not
    * have to manually select the RC code to use if they are using the
    default remote that shipped with the product. This helps alot for
    those unfamiliar with LIRC, since their product "works out of the box"
    with the remote the product came with. I agree though, that the user
    should be able to easily change the RC to be used if he/she decides to
    use a remote other than the default.

    Devin

    --
    Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
    http://www.kernellabs.com


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-23 16:23    [W:0.023 / U:33.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site