lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3 v2] at91/atmel-mci: inclusion of sd/mmc driver in at91sam9g45 chip and board
From
Date

[apologies for the MTA fart causing that weird, rouge blank email :-) ]

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:11 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Ben Nizette :
> >
> > static inline int gpio_is_valid(int number)
> > {
> > /* only some non-negative numbers are valid */
> > return ((unsigned)number) < ARCH_NR_GPIOS;
> > }
>
> I understand that the better way to solve this issue is to:
> - keep the AT91 way of specifying not connected pins (= 0)
> - code the gpio_is_valid() function for at91 that tests this way of
> handling not connected gpio
>

I'm not sure I'd break cross-arch compat here, but whatever. I guess it
depends how deeply the =0 stuff is ingrained in the at91 codebase

> I see that in arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h
> we include the asm-generic/gpio.h file... must I implement the full set
> of gpiolib ?

I'd suggest creating an ARCH_HAVE_GPIO_VALID (darn, long name) or
something; define it before #include <asm-generic/gpio.h> and #ifdef
protect the offending declaration in that header.

--Ben.

>
> Best regards,



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-02 23:17    [W:0.075 / U:0.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site