[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] mmc: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Alan Cox <> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro <> wrote:
>> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
>> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
>> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.
> So now what happens if we are paging and all our memory is tied up for
> writeback to a device or CIFS etc which can no longer allocate the memory
> to complete the write out so the MM can reclaim ?
> Am I missing something or is this patch set not addressing the case where
> the writeback thread needs to inherit PF_MEMALLOC somehow (at least for
> the I/O in question and those blocking it)

I agree.
At least, drivers for writeout is proper for using PF_MEMALLOC, I think.

> Alan
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:""> </a>

Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-17 11:35    [W:0.130 / U:2.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site