lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] mmc: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC
    Date
    Am Dienstag, 17. November 2009 11:32:36 schrieb Minchan Kim:
    > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
    > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:17:50 +0900 (JST)
    > >
    > > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    > >> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
    > >> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
    > >> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.
    > >
    > > So now what happens if we are paging and all our memory is tied up for
    > > writeback to a device or CIFS etc which can no longer allocate the memory
    > > to complete the write out so the MM can reclaim ?
    > >
    > > Am I missing something or is this patch set not addressing the case where
    > > the writeback thread needs to inherit PF_MEMALLOC somehow (at least for
    > > the I/O in question and those blocking it)
    >
    > I agree.
    > At least, drivers for writeout is proper for using PF_MEMALLOC, I think.

    For the same reason error handling should also use it, shouldn't it?

    Regards
    Oliver


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-17 11:41    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean