[lkml]   [2009]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] net: add dataref destructor to sk_buff
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:33:35PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Well, not with respect to the overall protocol, of course not. But with
>> respect to the buffer in question, it _has_ to be. Or am I missing
>> something?
> sendfile() has never guaranteed that the kernel is finished with
> the underlying pages when it returns.
> Cheers,

Clearly there must be _some_ mechanism to synchronize (e.g.
flush/barrier) though, right? Otherwise, that interface would seem to
be quite prone to races and would likely be unusable. So what does
said flush use to know when the buffer is free?


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-14 03:31    [W:0.081 / U:10.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site