lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.32-rc3
    On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:40:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    >
    > Could we, for consistency's sake, make it:
    >
    > 2.6.32-rc3+00052-g0eca52a-dirty
    > 2.6.32-rc3+
    >
    > ? Or do we want to keep the old version string alone for some reason?

    I'm a bit concerned that changing from what we've currently had:

    > 2.6.29-00052-g0eca52a-dirty

    might break some packaging scripts. I'm also personally used to that
    naming scheme; in fact at the moment I'm using
    2.6.32-rc1-00292-gb0390e2. :-)

    - Ted


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-06 20:23    [W:5.315 / U:0.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site