lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
From
Date
Wrong one.  Let's try the post java version instead.

8e29675: "implement slower async initiate and queue ramp up" introduced a
throughput regression for concurrent reader vs writer. Adjusting async delay
to use cfq_slice_async restored throughput.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/block/cfq-iosched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ linux-2.6/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -1343,17 +1343,18 @@ static int cfq_dispatch_requests(struct
*/
if (!cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->cfq_desktop) {
unsigned long last_sync = jiffies - cfqd->last_end_sync_rq;
+ unsigned long slice = cfq_slice_async;
unsigned int depth;

/*
* must wait a bit longer
*/
- if (last_sync < cfq_slice_sync) {
- cfq_schedule_dispatch(cfqd, cfq_slice_sync - last_sync);
+ if (last_sync < slice) {
+ cfq_schedule_dispatch(cfqd, slice - last_sync);
return 0;
}

- depth = last_sync / cfq_slice_sync;
+ depth = last_sync / slice;
if (depth < max_dispatch)
max_dispatch = depth;
}



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-04 13:39    [W:0.658 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site