[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
On 30-10-2009 08:00, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:48 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless.
>> Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns
>> would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future.
> So you know how to make the driver better, whine that it doesn't work,
> but don't help out either. Hey, good way to collaborate!
>>> It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things
>>> is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless
>>> you wish your work to be ignored, of course.)
>> I work with a lot of other maintainers. I would say that providing valuable
>> review feedback is also "working with" (at least I would be very happy with
>> such feedback in my projects).
> Face it though, people have read your feedback, thought about it, and
> decided to disagree. You seem to have a childish problem with that,
> appealing to higher authority to get your way just makes you look more
> childish.

There are various ways to disagree, and ignoring by John questions
from a merited developer both in this referenced lkml and current
threads looks at least strange (if not offensive) as well.

Jarek P.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-30 12:09    [W:0.100 / U:1.372 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site