Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) |
| |
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Doesn't look too bad, all things considered. Apart from "stock" cfq, > it's consistent. And being consistent is a Good Thing. Performance wise, > it's losing out to "stock" but looks pretty competetive otherwise.
I agree. And I think the numbers for the kconsole test are pretty conclusive. That's a big improvement (on top of the already very impressive improvement).
> So far that looks like a winner. The dictator wanted good latency, he's > getting good latency. I'll continue working on this on monday, while I'm > waiting for delivery of the Trabant.
Trabant?
As in the car?
Why would you _ever_ wait for delivery? The sane option would be to try to hide, or run away?
Linus
| |