lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Do not overload dispatch queue (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)


On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> Doesn't look too bad, all things considered. Apart from "stock" cfq,
> it's consistent. And being consistent is a Good Thing. Performance wise,
> it's losing out to "stock" but looks pretty competetive otherwise.

I agree. And I think the numbers for the kconsole test are pretty
conclusive. That's a big improvement (on top of the already very
impressive improvement).

> So far that looks like a winner. The dictator wanted good latency, he's
> getting good latency. I'll continue working on this on monday, while I'm
> waiting for delivery of the Trabant.

Trabant?

As in the car?

Why would you _ever_ wait for delivery? The sane option would be to try to
hide, or run away?

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-18 23:28    [W:0.219 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site