lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation
On 10/29/2009 04:46 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> No, the apps I'm familiar with (a DB and a JVM) need a timestamp
> not a monotonic counter. The timestamps must be relatively
> accurate (e.g. we've been talking about gettimeofday generically,
> but these apps would use clock_gettime for nsec resolution),
> monotonically increasing, and work properly across a VM
> migration. The timestamps are taken up to a 100K/sec or
> more so the apps need to ensure they are using the fastest
> mechanism available that meets those requirements.
>

Out of interest, do you know (and can you relate) why those apps need
100k/sec monotonically increasing timestamps?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-29 16:11    [W:0.457 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site