Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 | Date | Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:14:40 +0100 |
| |
Hi,
On Thursday 29 October 2009 14:52:50 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or > >> whatever to me. > > > > This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers, > > not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to > > revert rt2800pci patch from your tree. > > So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing
"git revert a9b3a9f"
done.
Dave, if you have problems with executing the command locally I'll be happy to supply you with the patch.
> lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones?
When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter should fix it" one to the _new_ code..
rt2800 drivers have their maintainers and I would like to know what they are doing besides complaining about users and staging tree..
-- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
| |