lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Difference between atomic operations and memory barriers
From
Date
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:30:45 +0530, "Leonidas ." said:

> So we can safely assume that pointer assignment will be done in an
> atomic manner?

Has anybody ever actually made a *production* CPU that had non-atomic
pointer assignments? And how long before the crazed programmers lynched
and burned the offending CPU designer at the stake? ;)

Non-atomic pointer assignments are the CPU design equivalent of Vogon poetry.
Just Say No. With a shotgun if needed.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-27 12:55    [W:0.077 / U:8.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site