[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations

* Jan Beulich <> wrote:

> >>> Ingo Molnar <> 23.10.09 13:48 >>>
> >makes sense (although there were a few odd ends in various ISA sound
> >driver details so this should go on the .33 not .32), but please
> >introduce a cleaner construct, like a new DMA_ISA_BIT_MASK() or so.
> Hmm, I could see DMA_ISA_BIT_MASK only replace DMA_BIT_MASK(24) (but
> specifically not being conditional upon CONFIG_ISA) without becoming
> confusing. Consequently this would eliminate the conditional in the .c
> file. [...]
> Or did you have something else in mind that I just don't realize?

DMA_ISA_BIT_MASK was what i had in mind.

> And any attempt to eliminate the conditional another way would just
> introduce a very similar conditional elsewhere; with this having a
> single user (and foreseeably not ever a second one) I would think this
> would just make the code less readable.

There's 3 other current uses of DMA_BIT_MASK(24) in arch/x86 - couldnt
those use ISA_DMA_BIT_MASK too?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-26 16:25    [W:0.058 / U:5.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site