Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:53:57 +0800 | From | Wu Fengguang <> | Subject | Re: Relicensing tracepoints and markers to Dual LGPL v2.1/GPL v2, headers to Dual BSD/GPL |
| |
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 05:03:52AM +0800, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > (updated email for Jesper Juhl) > > > > * Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to re-license the tracepoint.c/marker.c files from GPL to: > > > > > > * Dual LGPL v2.1/GPL v2 license. > > > > > > And re-license tracepoint.h/marker.h to: > > > > > > * Dual BSD/GPL v2 license. > > > > > > The goal is to allow sharing code between the kernel tracer and UST > > > (User-Space Tracer) project, which is a LGPL v2.1 library. Tracepoint > > > and marker headers might need to be included by proprietary or BSD > > > applications, hence the dual BSD/GPL v2 license for these two. > > > > > > I currently have the OK from Kosaki Motohiro for Fujitsu contributions, > > > which includes Zhao Lei and Lai Jiangshan. > > > > > > The missing approvals for Dual LGPL v2.1/GPL v2 relicensing are: > > > > > > For tracepoint.c: > > > > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> > > > > > > For marker.c: > > > > > > "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com> > > > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> > > > Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> > > > > Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> > > > > I don't think I have enough significant changes in there to actually > require my approval for relicensing, but since you ask; I personally > do not have a problem with that file being Dual LGPL v2.1/GPL v2 > licensed.
Me too.
Thanks, Fengguang
| |