[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> These are pretty obvious bug fixes and should go to linux-next ASAP IMHO.

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Bug fixes go into main not linux-next. Lets make sure these fixes really
> work and then merge.

Regardless, patches 1-2 and should _really_ go to Linus' tree (and
eventually -stable) while we figure out the rest of the problems. They
fix obvious regressions in the code paths and we have reports from
people that they help. Yes, they don't fix everything for everyone but
we there's no upside in holding back fixes that are simple one line
fixes to regressions.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-24 08:51    [W:0.057 / U:6.472 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site