Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:49:46 -0400 (EDT) | From | Justin Piszcz <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.31+2.6.31.4: XFS - All I/O locks up to D-state after 24-48 hours (sysrq-t+w available) |
| |
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > >> >> >> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Dave Chinner wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:18:58AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dave Chinner wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:17:42PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >>>>>> It has happened again, all sysrq-X output was saved this time. >>>>> ..... >>>>> >>>>> All pointing to log IO not completing. >>>>> >>> .... >>>> So far I do not have a reproducible test case, >>> >>> Ok. What sort of load is being placed on the machine? >> Hello, generally the load is low, it mainly serves out some samba shares. >> >>> >>> It appears that both the xfslogd and the xfsdatad on CPU 0 are in >>> the running state but don't appear to be consuming any significant >>> CPU time. If they remain like this then I think that means they are >>> stuck waiting on the run queue. Do these XFS threads always appear >>> like this when the hang occurs? If so, is there something else that >>> is hogging CPU 0 preventing these threads from getting the CPU? >> Yes, the XFS threads show up like this on each time the kernel crashed. So >> far >> with 2.6.30.9 after ~48hrs+ it has not crashed. So it appears to be some >> issue >> between 2.6.30.9 and 2.6.31.x when this began happening. Any >> recommendations >> on how to catch this bug w/certain options enabled/etc? >> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave. >>> -- >>> Dave Chinner >>> david@fromorbit.com >>> >> > > Uptime with 2.6.30.9: > > 06:18:41 up 2 days, 14:10, 14 users, load average: 0.41, 0.21, 0.07 > > No issues yet, so it first started happening in 2.6.(31).(x). > > Any further recommendations on how to debug this issue? BTW: Do you view > this > as an XFS bug or MD/VFS layer issue based on the logs/output thus far? > > Justin. > >
Any other ideas?
Currently stuck on 2.6.30.9.. (no issues, no lockups)-- Box normally has no load at all either.. Has anyone else reported similar problems?
Justin.
| |