[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Remove or convert empty ioctls ?
    On 10/15/2009 11:01 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
    >> "no particular value" is highly subjective, and I think unprovable,
    >> without an exhaustive survey of userland programs interacting with
    >> kernel drivers. Userland programs often interact with a -class- of
    >> drivers, expecting predictable behavior from a DoThisThing ioctl, with
    >> EINVAL or "other weird error code" returned intentionally.
    >> Changing the return codes seems quite unwise.
    > We've changed lots of them to -ENOTTY over the past few years, nobody has
    > even noticed (you included ;))
    > SuS says an unknown ioctl code returns -ENOTTY.

    These are not unknown ioctls; they are ioctls that the driver author
    close to implement rather than the default (ENOTTY).


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-15 17:33    [W:0.019 / U:3.468 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site