[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call
    On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:49:05PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > On 10/12/2009 09:49 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
    > >
    > > This patchset implements a new system call, clone3() that lets a process
    > > specify the pids of the child process.
    > >
    > A system call named clone3() taking two parameters is just too weird to
    > live. No, please.

    Except we can't use clone2() because it conflicts on ia64. Care to propose
    a name you would prefer?

    Also I was a bit suprised to discover there are plenty of examples where this
    convention has not been followed: vm86, lseek64, and mmap2 to name a few. In
    fact, of the 46 __NR_foo[[:digit:]]+, 36 break this convention on x86-32.

    -Matt Helsley

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-14 03:49    [W:0.021 / U:34.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site