Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [Patchs vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters | Date | Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:21:34 +1030 |
| |
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:27:53 am Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Does this mean we can kill local.h soon? > > Can we remove local.h from modules?
This looks sweet to me!
Only comment: not sure struct module_ref is required once we have __percpu markers.
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Thanks! Rusty.
| |