lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Patchs vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters
Date
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:27:53 am Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > Does this mean we can kill local.h soon?
>
> Can we remove local.h from modules?

This looks sweet to me!

Only comment: not sure struct module_ref is required once we have __percpu
markers.

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Thanks!
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-13 14:01    [W:0.368 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site